This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

One of the Government's witnesses, in this case, testified that, three weeks after Hoosier (D) allegedly robbed the bank, he saw D with money, and wearing what appeared to be diamond rings. The witness testified that, while in D's presence, D's girlfriend said, 'That ain't nothing, you should have seen the money we had in the hotel room.' D said nothing in response to the girlfriend's statement. The testimony was admitted at trial over D's objection. D appealed. The government contends that the statement constitutes an admission.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.