United States v. Mafnas,
701 F.2d 83 (9th Cir. 1983)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D was employed by the Guam Armored Car Service which was hired by the Bank of Hawaii and the Bank of America to deliver bags of money. On three occasions D opened the bags and removed money. As a result, he was convicted of three counts of stealing money from the banks. D was convicted in the U.S. District Court of Guam of stealing money from two federally insured banks in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b) which makes it a crime to '. . . take . . . with intent to steal . . . any money belonging to . . . any bank. . . .' D appealed; he had lawful possession of the bags with the consent of the banks and as such he was not guilty as the statute requires a trespassory taking.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner