Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D is charged with one count of Possession of Child Pornography. P seeks to introduce evidence that D previously pled guilty and was sentenced on two counts of child pornography possession in this same court in 2001. In that 2001 case, D was sentenced to 36 months in prison to be followed by 36 months of supervised release. While under supervision, the Court twice revoked D's supervised release. The 2001 case did not conclude until approximately 2008. P asserts that the conviction for possession of child pornography is admissible under Rule 414. D argues that the prior 2001 conviction should still be excluded pursuant Rule 403.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.