Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Irish police in Dublin, found firearms in crates sent from New York that allegedly contained electric paper drills. The shipper of the crates was Standard Tools, which was owned by a Bernard McKeon (D). D was investigated, and several documents were found with D's fingerprints on them as well as those of his wife, Olive. D's first trial ended in a mistrial. The second trial, ended in a mistrial when the Government refused to produce classified documents regarding alleged foreign wiretaps. However, during the opening statement of that trial, the lawyer portrayed Mrs. McKeon as an innocent party and that the documents were not prepared on the Xerox machine that was at the bank where she worked. During the third trial, Mrs. McKeon was portrayed differently than at the second trial. D abandoned his theory of defense relating to the Xerox machine and was now willing to admit that the documents had been xeroxed at the bank. The Government moved to introduce evidence of the lawyer's opening statement in the second trial arguing that the statement was the admission of a party opponent under Rule 801(d)(2), D was convicted and appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.