The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Snyder (D) was convicted of child pornography charges. The victim was Michael Doe, an eleven-year-old boy who had engaged in sex with D and another man. The images of Doe were posted on the internet. At trial, the court held that D had shown neither a compelling reason to hold a hearing nor a compelling need to order a psychological examination. D’s motion in this regard simply stated that Doe could not differentiate between truth and fantasy and that upon information and belief, Doe was being treated with anti-depressants, which could make the witness incompetent to testify at trial. D’s motion was denied. D appealed; the district court should have granted his request for a psychological exam to determine the competency of the victim.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.