The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Taylor (D) was indicted for fraudulently getting a loan by making false representations of material facts. In a letter dated January 16, 1975, D represented that Home Federal held a first lien on certain property. The letter was telecopied from San Diego to Wittman in Houston. Wittman then photocopied it and sent the photocopy to the bank. On January 24, 1975, D signed a letter of agreement confirming Home Federal's lien, and the loan to Wittman was made. Months later, Wittman defaulted. At trial, an issue was raised as to one element of the charged offense, interstate communication to execute fraud. It could not be proven whether D signed the letter in Texas or California. The trial court allowed the government (P) to introduce into evidence a photocopy of the January 16 letter because P claimed that the original had been unsuccessfully subpoenaed from the relevant parties. D's counsel did not object to the original document's unavailability. It was never established that this was a direct copy of the telecopy, so the question as to where the letter was actually signed was never answered. D was convicted, and he appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.