The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Valencia (D) was arrested and charged with conspiracy to possess and intent to distribute cocaine, and money laundering. Witnesses gave evidence that D was the California connection for various North Dakota drug dealers. During trial evidence pursuant to 404(b) was ruled inadmissible under a 403 analysis. However, the judge cited that the evidence might be admissible under 609. It was later admitted. D was convicted. D appealed citing the admission of a prior conviction under Rule 609.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.