Wal-Mart v. Cockrell
61 S.W.3d 774 (2001)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P and his parents went to the layaway department at a D store. P stayed for about five minutes and decided to leave. As he was going out the front door a loss-prevention officer, Navarro, stopped him and requested that P follow him to the manager's office. Once in the office, Navarro told him to pull his pants down. P put his hands between his shorts and underwear, pulled them out, and shook them. Nothing fell out. Navarro told him to take off his shirt. P raised his shirt, revealing a large bandage which covered a surgical wound on the right side of his abdomen. P had recently had a liver transplant. Navarro asked him to take off the bandage, despite P's explanation that the bandage maintained a sterile environment around his surgical wound. Navarro's insisted. P took down the bandage, revealing the wound. Two other D employees, were in the office when P lifted his shirt. Navarro apologized and let P go. D sued P for false imprisonment and assault. P was awarded $300,000 for past mental anguish. D appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner