P was severely injured four years ago when he was run down by a taxicab owned by Seon Cab Corp. (D) and negligently operated by Marchese (D). The individual Carlton (D) is a stockholder of 10 corporations including Seon, each of which has two cabs and each cab has only limited insurance ($10,000). Although independent of one another, these corporations are allegedly operated as a single entity with regard to financing, supplies, repairs, employees and garaging and are all named as defendants. P also asserts that he can hold the stockholders personally liable because a multiple corporate structure is an unlawful attempt to defraud the general public. D moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that as to him it 'fails to state a cause of action.' The court at Special Term granted the motion but the Appellate Division, by a divided vote, reversed, holding that a valid cause of action was sufficiently stated. D Carlton appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.