The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P was severely injured four years ago when he was run down by a taxicab owned by Seon Cab Corp. (D) and negligently operated by Marchese (D). The individual Carlton (D) is a stockholder of 10 corporations including Seon, each of which has two cabs and each cab has only limited insurance ($10,000). Although independent of one another, these corporations are allegedly operated as a single entity with regard to financing, supplies, repairs, employees and garaging and are all named as defendants. P also asserts that he can hold the stockholders personally liable because a multiple corporate structure is an unlawful attempt to defraud the general public. D moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that as to him it 'fails to state a cause of action.' The court at Special Term granted the motion but the Appellate Division, by a divided vote, reversed, holding that a valid cause of action was sufficiently stated. D Carlton appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.