The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P slipped and fell on a wet floor at D's store. P was a customer in the store at the time. P experienced lower-back pain following the fall. Approximately eighteen months later, P visited Dr. Delbridge, an orthopedic surgeon, in response to his lingering lower-back pain. Dr. Delbridge administered an epidural block in an effort to relieve the pain. The procedure involved a spinal steroid injection. As a result of the epidural block, P developed an infection which led to spinal meningitis. He eventually recovered from the disease. P sued D seeking damages associated with the injuries he received as a result of his fall. The damage claim included the spinal meningitis. D argued that the epidural block 18 months later was a superseding cause of any damages associated with P’s spinal meningitis. The court refused D’s instruction regarding superceding cause. P got the verdict, and D appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.