Weltzin v. Nail

618 N.W.2d 293 (2000)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Ps are shareholders of LaPorte City Cooperative Elevators. Ps brought a shareholder’s derivative lawsuit against Ds. Ps allege that manager Michael Nail committed a negligent breach of his fiduciary duties and made fraudulent misrepresentations. They seek compensatory and punitive damages from Nail for his actions. Ps also contend that several former directors and the company’s loan officer committed negligence in the performance of their duties. For these actions, Ps seek money damages. Ps filed a demand for jury trial with their petition. Nail answered with the affirmative defense of comparative fault, including a failure to mitigate damages, and asserted he was immune from liability for actions taken in performance of his duties. Ds asserted their immunity as well. Ds motioned to strike the jury demand made by Ps. The district court sustained Ds motion to strike the Ps demand for a jury trial. The court explained that a shareholder’s derivative lawsuit could only be brought in equity and, therefore, no jury was warranted. Ps then timely filed an application for interlocutory appeal on the jury issue. The shareholders argue that because their suit raises legal issues and remedies, they are entitled to a jury determination.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.