Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P operates a skating center and D operates an auto dealership on an adjoining parcel of land. Surface waters flowed naturally through P’s parcel onto D’s parcel. Those waters did not damage the property. In 1980, after a skating rink was constructed, D suffered serious flooding. D built a wall, and it acted as a dam and redirected the water underneath the floor of P’s skating center. P suffered serious damage and had to close down. P sued D for damages and a mandatory injunction to remove the wall. D counterclaimed for damages and to enjoin P from damaging the wall. P obtained a partial summary judgment to the effect that as long as the skating rink was constructed in accordance with the South Florida Building Code, D's lower-elevation lot remained the servient tenement for all surface water flowing from the skating center. The jury found in favor of P in excess of one million dollars in damages. The Court of Appeal reversed the judgment against D holding that the trial judge had applied an incorrect rule of law in granting the summary judgment and that the jury instruction based on the summary judgment also was error. P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.