Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Berenda Mesa Water District (D invited bids on a construction project. White (P) was the low bidder ($427,890 vs. $494, 320). P's bid was based on unwarranted soil reports and statements of an engineer. P's bid was submitted on the assumption that no more than 7% of the soil to be excavated was hard rock. The hard rock actually composed 50% of the soil. P filed a surety bond for 10% of his bid. P discovered that he made an error in his bid, and before the acceptance of the bid, P informed D that he was withdrawing his bid. The mistake was explained to D, but they still accepted P's bid. P refused to perform, and D kept the performance bond and awarded the contract to the next lowest bidder. P sued to recover the bond. At trial, P alleged that he was guilty of simple negligence in failing to determine that the reports were not accurate and that because of this factual mistake the contract with D should be rescinded because D had suffered no damage. P appealed the judgment for D.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner