White v. Fletcher/Mayo/Associates,
251 Ga. 203 (1983)
Facts
White (P) began his work in advertising with FMA (D) in Missouri, was eventually transferred to Atlanta and became a senior vice president. D began merger talks with Doyle Dane Bernbach, and a deal was reached. P had purchased stock in D over a period of time and owned 7114 share of D's common stock. The book value was $85,000. P voted in favor of the merger and got $145,000 in Doyle Dane stock. Prior to the merger, P had no written employment contract, and D and Dane conditioned its purchase of D on P's signature on agreements containing restrictive covenants in favor of D and Doyle Dane. D was told that he should sign the agreements because they were necessary to guarantee his job and secure broader career opportunities for him. It was a fact that P had D's biggest client under his care and supervision as well as other clients and he was considered a key employee. P signed and soon after the merger, he was fired. P sued over the covenants. The trial judge found them overbroad and blue-penciled them and then ordered them enforced. P appealed.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner