The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

On June 13, Wholesale (P) agreed to perform work for Decker to install a gravel driveway. There were no time limitations, but the contract specified payment was to be made in 90 days. P started work and told D that the work should be completed in one week even though P believed it had 90 days. Difficulties in the work surfaced because the ground was too wet. P decided to wait for the ground to dry. D contacted P on July 12, and on July 19 to get the work finished. P responded that he would get right on it. D called on July 28 to terminate, and P promised to show up the next day. P did not appear, and D terminated the agreement. There was still 45 more days remaining. P sued, and judgment was entered for D; P's conduct constituted anticipatory repudiation. D appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.