Wilburn v. Maritrans Gp Inc.
139 F.3d 350 (3rd Cir. 1998)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P was injured when he was swept off the deck of the tug, the Enterprise, by a huge wave during a storm. At the time of the accident, P was an able-bodied tankerman. P was 38 and earning $44,000 per year. P sued D for negligence and also claimed that the tug was not seaworthy. Post-accident P still worked as a tankerman, but now with permanent injuries to his left hand, arm, and shoulder, he was severely limited. P also applied for being a barge captain, but he would be required to sail coastwise. Since the accident, P was mentally unable to sail out of sight of land. Dr. Newman testified to the extent of his permanent injuries. Dr. Sadoff testified about his P’s post-traumatic stress rehabilitation which would require the use of a real ship. P got the verdict for $1,000,000 lost future earning capacity. D moved for judgment as a matter of law, and it was granted. The court held there was insufficient evidence of loss of future earning capacity. P appealed.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner