Wilk v. Georges Sup. Ct. Of Or.,

267 Or. 19 (1973).

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Georges (D) operated a garden supply and nursery business. Wilk (P) and her husband entered the nursery in search of a Christmas tree. The bare planks in that section of the store were slippery when wet and D placed asphalt on them and a warning sign by the gate. P slipped and fell on one of the planks and suffered injuries. The trial court instructed the jury that if a customer coming onto the premises knows of a dangerous condition or if the condition is obvious, there is no duty on the part of the owner to correct or warn of the condition unless, despite the fact that the danger is known or obvious, the owner should anticipate that the dangerous condition will cause physical harm to the customer. The judgment was given to D. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.