Witso v. Overby

627 N.W.2d 63 (2001)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

Overby (D) gave birth to M. At the time of M’s birth, D was married to James, and by statute, James was presumed to be the father. Witso (P) argues that he and D had an affair that included frequent sexual contact during the time M was conceived. P claims that he is M’s father and wants to compel genetic testing under the MPA. P supports this claim with an affidavit alleging the sexual contact during the time M was conceived and that D admits that he was the father. D denies making the statement and contends that she and James had frequent sexual contact during the proper period of time. The question of genetic testing was certified.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.