The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The Stanford Daily (P) covered a campus demonstration in which nine police officers had been injured. The photos in the paper indicated that the photographer had been located where he could have photographed the assailants. Two days after the paper printed the articles and photos on the demonstration, a warrant was issued to search their offices for negatives or film which might identify the assailants. No evidence was found. P brought a civil action in district court, who granted declaratory relief. The court held that the 4th Amendment forbids the issuance of a warrant to search for such materials in the possession of one not suspected of a crime except upon demonstration that a subpoena would be impracticable. It also held that the 1st Amendment barred the search of newspaper offices except upon a clear showing that important materials would otherwise be destroyed or removed and that a restraining order would be futile. The Court of Appeals upheld the District Court findings. Zurcher (D) appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.