Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
The prosecutor used his peremptory challenges to strike all four black persons on the venire, and a jury composed only of white persons was selected. D moved to discharge the jury before it was sworn on the ground that Kentucky's (P) removal of the black veniremen violated D's rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to a jury drawn from a cross-section of the community, and under the Fourteenth Amendment to equal protection of the laws. That motion was denied. D was convicted on both counts. The Supreme Court of Kentucky affirmed. It held that a defendant alleging lack of a fair cross-section must demonstrate systematic exclusion of a group of jurors from the venire. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co