Kegerise v. Susquehanna Township School District

321 F.R.D. 121 (2016)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P is the former superintendent of D. Ds are the School District and three members of the District's School Board, Carol L. Karl, Jesse Rawls, Sr., and Mark Y. Sussman. P sued Ds seeking redress for her alleged discharge as superintendent, which she asserts violated both federal and state law. P moved for judgment on the pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) on some of the claims set forth in P's third amended complaint because D's responses to some of the allegations in P's pleading were insufficient under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b). P contends that the corresponding allegations should be deemed admitted. And once those allegations are deemed admitted, Plaintiff argues she is entitled to judgment on the pleadings on Counts II, III, IV, VIII, IX, and X of her third amended complaint.