Red Hill Outing Club v. Hammond,

722 A.2d 501 (N.H. 1998)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Hammond purchased land and cleared the land for use as a ski slope. From 1969 to 1979, the Red Hill Club leased the land from Hammond. In 1979, Hammond conveyed the land by quitclaim deed to the Club for nominal consideration with a condition subsequent. About a decade later the club began having problems and did not obtain permits for two years straight and closed during the 93-94 winter season. Ds then filed notice of reentry and possession claiming that the Club had breached its condition for failing to provide ski facilities for two consecutive years. the Club (P) sued Hammond (D) seeking a declaratory judgment regarding the relative rights of the parties. The trial court strictly construed the provisions of the condition subsequent and found that the obligation to provide skiing facilities only required P to maintain and make available the premises as a ski slope. The court then found that P did not breach that condition. D appealed.