Shull v. B.F. Goodrich Company

477 N.E.2d 924 (1985)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P was directed by his employer to D to pick up a load of tires. P was injured when a dock-plate upon which P was standing, malfunctioned, throwing P to the floor of his trailer. P sued for negligence and at trial relied upon both direct proof of D's alleged negligence and the inference of that negligence under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. P tendered the following instruction: 'There is a doctrine in law called res ipsa loquitur, which doctrine may come into effect under certain conditions in a negligence case. In order for the doctrine to apply, you must find that the following facts existed on May 29, 1979, the time of the occurrence in question: First: That the plaintiff was injured as a proximate result of the occurrence; Second: That the instrumentality causing the injury was under the exclusive control of D; Third: That the occurrence was of a sort which usually does not occur in the absence of negligence on the part of the person in control.” The trial court refused. D got the verdict, and P appealed.