Thompson v. County Of Alameda

614 P.2d 728 (1980)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

James F. was a juvenile offender with latent extremely dangerous and violent propensities regarding young children. The County who kept James F. in custody knew of these dangerous propensities but nonetheless released James on a temporary leave to his mother's custody despite James' announced intentions to kill a child of let out. Ps, husband and wife, and their minor son lived in the City of Piedmont, a few doors from the residence of the mother of James. No one in the local community was alerted of James' presence, and within 24 hours, he killed a 5-year-old boy. Thomspon (P), the parents, sued the County (D) claiming that the death was caused by D's 'reckless, wanton and grossly negligent' actions in releasing James into the community; failing to advise and/or warn James' mother, the local police, or 'parents of young children within the immediate vicinity' of the residence of James' mother; failing to exercise due care in maintaining custody and control over James through his mother in her capacity as County's agent; and failing to exercise reasonable care in selecting James' mother to serve as Ds agent in maintaining custody and control over James. D demurred contending that Government Code granted D immunity. The trial court sustained D's demurrer. P appealed.