Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Zeni (P) was walking to work along a well-used pedestrian snow path on the street with her back to traffic. The sidewalk was covered with snow. Anderson's (D) car struck P, causing severe injuries. An eyewitness testified that D's windshield was clouded and that he doubted if the occupant could see out. D testified that she did not hear nor feel P strike her car. The eyewitness said that P flipped over the fender and hood. D maintained that P's failure to use the sidewalk constituted contributory negligence because of a statute. The statute required pedestrians to use the sidewalk. P suffered from amnesia and had no recollection of the accident. There was testimony at trial that indicated it was safer to use the roadway instead of the sidewalk during the winter. The jury gave the verdict to P. The court of appeals reversed the jury verdict, and P appealed.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co