This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Ds own a floral design company. P operates a commercial signage company called Sign-O-Lite Signs. Ds signed a pre-printed form contract provided by a Sign-O-Lite sales representative. Ds agreed to lease commercial signage that would be designed, manufactured, and installed by Sign-O-Lite. On February 26, 2003, the owner of Sign-O-Lite signed the contract but did not send it to Ds. On February 28, 2003, Ds notified Sign-O-Lite that they were canceling the contract. Nevertheless, on March 19, 2003, Ds received a letter dated March 11 from Sign-O-Lite notifying them that the company accepted their contract offer. P brought this breach of contract action arguing that paragraph 23 of the contract made the Ds' offer irrevocable. That paragraph states: Acceptance by the Owner [Sign-O-Lite] must be by an executive officer of the Owner. This Agreement shall not be binding upon the Owner after execution by the Advertiser(s) [the McCorkles], and this Agreement shall constitute an irrevocable offer by the Advertiser(s) to the Owner for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of execution by the Advertiser(s). The execution of the Agreement by a sales representative of the Owner is in no way acceptance by the Owner. The Superior Court affirmed the judgment, and this court granted discretionary review.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.