Abbott v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company

54 F.4th 912 (6th Cir. 2022)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D used C-8 to manufacture Teflon© products. C-8 (PFOA), is a synthetic organic chemical that is soluble in water and persists in both the human body and the environment. D discharged C-8 into the air, the Ohio River, and landfills without limits until the early 2000s. D learned in the 1960s that C-8 was toxic to animals and was reaching groundwater in the communities surrounding its plant. By the late 1980s, D internally considered the chemical a possible human carcinogen and found that it stayed in the human bloodstream for years. Despite warnings from its C-8 supplier D increased its C-8 discharges between 1984 and 2000. Many brought numerous claims under West Virginia common law, seeking equitable, injunctive, and declaratory relief, and punitive and compensatory damages for alleged injuries arising from C-8 exposure. The court certified a class of nearly 80,000 individuals 'whose drinking water is or has been contaminated with' C-8 attributable to D's C-8 discharges. In 2005, the trial court approved a class-wide settlement agreement, called the Leach Agreement. Under a unique settlement, a Science Panel engaged in the specified epidemiological study. The Panel reported probable findings for six diseases: kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, diagnosed high cholesterol, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and preeclampsia. Fifty afflictions were excluded. P was exposed to C-8 contaminated water at home and in his community. At age 16, Abbott found a mass in his left testicle, and, after surgically removing his testicle, doctors diagnosed him with testicular cancer. He did not experience a relapse until 10 years later when he was beginning to plan a family with his wife, Julie, while still living in the Pomeroy region. P sought medical help for pain in his remaining testicle. A definitive diagnosis of testicular cancer came only after doctors removed his testicle to conduct a pathology analysis. The spread of the cancer to his lymph nodes required further surgery, and P must take testosterone injections due to his loss of both testicles. The jury found for P awarding them $40 million and $10 million in damages, respectively. The district court later applied the Ohio Tort Reform Act to Julie Abbott's award, reducing it to $250,000.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.