This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

On June 30, 1959, D and Norma Rhoades (brother and sister) became the owners of the property which is the subject of this suit, consisting of 68 acres of land. They were tenants-in-common with P having an undivided three-fifths and Norma having an undivided two-fifths. As of May 1983, the property was appraised to have a value of $325,000. P is a government securities trader. D and Norma Rhoades are attorneys licensed to practice in New York. On May 10, 1983, the jury in P securities action returned a verdict against D for $1,519,898.59, of which $1,385,401.06 plus post-judgment interest remains outstanding and unpaid. On May 19, 1983, the day before the judgment against D was signed, D executed a deed that conveyed the property to Norma Rhoades, for $1.00 and unspecified 'other good consideration.' P sued D to declare the transfer void. P argues that the conveyance is fraudulent because the conveyance was made without fair consideration by D in a lawsuit who failed to satisfy a final judgment against him. D contends that the conveyance of property was a valid transfer, grounded upon the consideration of an antecedent debt owed by D to Ms. Rhoades, that the conveyance did not render D insolvent and that it was not made with intent to defraud.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.