This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Kelly-Springfield formerly operated a tire manufacturing plant, and D supplied some of the chemicals used by Kelly-Springfield in its manufacturing operations. Ps and decedents are former employees of Kelly-Springfield who worked at the plant at various times between 1940 and 1987. The plant closed in 1987. Ps allege that they developed various diseases as a result of contact with toxic chemicals to which they were exposed during the manufacturing process at Kelly-Springfield. Ps seek recoveries from D based on the following theories: (1) strict liability; (2) breach of warranty; (3) negligence; and (4) fraudulent concealment. Ps claim that D manufactured and sold to Kelly-Springfield specific toxic chemicals, and that Ps were exposed to these toxic substances and that such exposure caused or contributed to a certain disease contracted by the worker(s). D moves for a summary judgment in that the plaintiffs have failed to produce evidence upon which a reasonable juror could rely to conclude that D-supplied chemicals or those supplied by another entity, in fact, caused their various ailments. In short, Ps cannot prove causation.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.