This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Bail's (P) complaint sought $100,000 in damages in an ad damnum clause. On the morning of trial, P made a motion to amend his complaint to $250,000 in damages. That motion was denied; trial was set for the same day. The judge determined that Cunningham (D) had not been given notice of the motion. P was awarded $150,000 in damages by the jury. P motioned to amend his complaint after trial to $150,000. That motion was granted. The award was reduced to $135,000 because one defendant had given P $15,000 before trial in return for a covenant not to pursue. D appealed the decision, seeking a remittitur from $135,000 to $85,000. D contends that the ad damnum clause sets the limits of recovery and that the judge abused discretion by allowing it to be amended after the verdict was rendered.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.