Barron v. Martin-Marietta Corp.

868 F.Supp. 1203 (N.D. Cal. 1994)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Ps were all exposed to fumes leaking from missile canisters when they place them in storage after removal from the USS Nannie Keg. They became light headed and dizzy and abandoned the area. Ps claim to have suffered grievous personal injuries about the head, neck, torso and extremities, including injury to the nervous system and internal organs including organic brain dysfunction, acute toxic encephalopathy, memory dysfunction, mild organic mood syndrome, mild gait dysfunction, respiratory irritation, acute inhalation injury with bronchospasm, sinusitis and depression. Ps also added into the claim a fear of cancer. They adduced no evidence that they have suffered physical injuries with which there is a verifiable causal nexus to cancer. They were most likely exposed to toluene. D manufactured its canisters pursuant to a contract between D and the U.S. Government. The contract provided for the design and manufacture of canisters according to specifications that were precise as to the general design of the canisters. D moved for summary judgment and/or summary adjudication on the following grounds: (1) the government contractor defense immunizes D from liability; (2) the missiles or canisters did not cause Ps' injuries; and (3) Ps cannot recover damages for 'fear of cancer.'

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.