This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P purchased a farm from Pearl Beall. At that time, the property was farmed by Pearl's son, Calvin Beall. P and Calvin were second cousins. Calvin was married to D. P agreed that Calvin could continue to farm the property if he would pay the annual property taxes. Calvin and D owned and resided on a parcel of about one-half acre that was bordered on three sides by the farm bought by P. P obtained a three-year option to purchase Calvin's and D's parcel for $28,000.00. The option recited a consideration of $100.00, which was paid by check. In 1971, the parties executed a new option, for five years, but on the same terms and reciting an additional $100.00 consideration. This 1971 option was never exercised by P, but prior to its expiration the following language was appended at the bottom of the page: 'As of October 6, 1975, we, Calvin E. Beall and Cecelia M. Beall, agree to continue this option agreement three more years -- Feb. 1, 1976, to Feb. 1, 1979. Calvin died in August 1977, and D now holds the fee simple title by right of survivorship. In letters dated May 24, 1978, and September 14, 1978, P advised D that he was electing to exercise the option. D refused to attend settlement, and this suit for specific performance ensued. P presented his evidence. D moved to dismiss the bill of complaint. The chancellor granted the motion because she felt that the option agreements were not supported by consideration in that 'no benefit . . . flowed to Cecelia Beall.' There was no consideration recited in that extension or purported extension of the original option contract. P appealed. P contends that the chancellor erred in dismissing the bill of complaint and in excluding certain testimony relative to oral transactions with Calvin.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.