Bird v. Holbrook
4 Bing. 628, 130 Eng. Rep. 911 (1825)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Holbrook (D) owned a walled garden about a mile from his house. D had problems with people stealing things from his garden. In an effort not to prevent intrusion onto the property but to catch an intruder, D set up a spring-gun trap in this garden. He did not post notice of this trap. Bird (P) innocently chased an escaped bird into the garden. P climbed the back wall and called out his presence. He received no reply and proceeded. He set the trap off and severely damaged his knee. P sued for the damage cause to his knee by the spring gun trap. D claimed that P had no action because he committed an act of unlawful trespass.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner