Blonder-Tongue Laboratories v. University Of Illinois Foundation

402 U.S. 313 (1971)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

The rule of law in patent cases was to allow a patentee another suit even if he lost a first suit to uphold his patent; Triplett v. Lowell 297 U.S. 638 (1936). The lower courts allowed Foundation (P) to maintain a second action after losing its first. P owned a patent for a radio and television antenna. Its patent was held invalid in its first suit. P then sued Blonder (D) for infringement on the same patent. D asserted collateral estoppel. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.