Blonder-Tongue Laboratories v. University Of Illinois Foundation
402 U.S. 313 (1971)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
The rule of law in patent cases was to allow a patentee another suit even if he lost a first suit to uphold his patent; Triplett v. Lowell 297 U.S. 638 (1936). The lower courts allowed Foundation (P) to maintain a second action after losing its first. P owned a patent for a radio and television antenna. Its patent was held invalid in its first suit. P then sued Blonder (D) for infringement on the same patent. D asserted collateral estoppel. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner