Board Of Control Of Eastern Michigan University v. Burgess

45 Mich.App. 183, 206 N.W.2d 256 (1973)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D signed a document which purported to grant to P a 60-day option to purchase S's home. That document, which was drafted by P's agent, acknowledged receipt by D of 'One and no/100 ($ 1.00) Dollar and other valuable consideration'. P concedes that neither the one dollar nor any other consideration was ever paid or even tendered to D. On April 14, 1966, P delivered to D written notice of its intention to exercise the option. On the closing date, D rejected P's tender of the purchase price. P sued for specific performance. D claimed that the purported option was void for want of consideration. The court held that D's acknowledgment of receipt of consideration bars any subsequent contention to the contrary. The trial judge entered judgment for P. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.