This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Mattefs (D) submitted a bid to Boise (P) for construction. D was the third lowest bidder, but the others below him refused to accept the bid. P sued D for the difference in its bid price and those that were accepted. The trial court ruled for D and P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.