The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Mattefs (D) submitted a bid to Boise (P) for construction. D was the third lowest bidder, but the others below him refused to accept the bid. P sued D for the difference in its bid price and those that were accepted. The trial court ruled for D and P appealed.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.