Bowles v. Mahoney

202 F.2d 330 (1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 935 (1953)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Ralph Mahoney (P), a seven-year-old boy was injured when a dilapidated retaining wall collapsed and fell in him. The retaining wall had been built in the parking lot adjacent to the leased premises that P's uncle had been leasing. The parking lot where the wall was built was owned by the District of Columbia. The lease of that lot did not obligate the landlord to make repairs, and there was no statute imposing that duty on the landlord. P contends that because D built the wall for the benefit of her property was under a duty to maintain it in a safe condition and that she was negligent in that duty and liable in damages to the invitee. The District was charged with permitting the structure to be built and negligently failing to keep it in repair.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.