This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Wade executed and delivered the letter to appellee that is on page 836 Rabin 4th. Appellee (D), who as one of the defendants in this suit, asserted that she was the owner of an undivided 2/7ths interest in the lands under dispute. D also alleged that constructive notice was given as the instrument was recorded. P contends that the instrument is void as the deed does not describe any real property.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.