Bowling v. Heil Company

511 N.E.2d 373 (1987)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Bowling (P) delivered gravel to his residence using a dump truck with a hoist system manufactured by Heil (D). After dumping the gravel, the truck bed would not return to the down position. P leaned underneath over the truck chassis to see what was wrong. P then grabbed the lever on the pump valve assembly and manipulated it. The bed rapidly descended and killed P instantly. The jury found P contributorily negligent, and damages were assessed at $1.75 million. The jury determined that D was both negligent and strictly liable, that P was contributorily negligent but that he had not assumed a known risk, and that the following percentages of fault were attributable to P, D, and Robco: to D, forty percent; to P, thirty percent; and to Robco, thirty percent. The court of appeals affirmed the jury's verdict, but remanded the case with directions to enter judgment against D in the amount of $700,000 only, representing forty percent of $1.75 million. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.