This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

In March 1997, Burch (P) purchased a home. Approximately four months after closing, D gave P a warranty booklet. The warranty was in a 31-page booklet and P admits to signing the application for the warranty but not reading it. A clause in the application states that the buyer has read the binding arbitration provision. When problems developed in January 1999, they contacted D to fix them. The problem involved saturated floor joists. D contested liability but offered to completely dry the crawl space, to install additional foundation vents, to install a six-mil vapor barrier, treat the fungus, and reinstall insulation except at the rim joist. Attempts to resolve the problems failed, and Burch (P) filed suit for damages, and both parties stipulated to waive mediation. D filed a motion for a stay and a motion to compel arbitration based on the Home Buyer’s Warranty. The court concluded that P entered into a valid contractual agreement to resolve any problems by arbitration. P now seeks a writ of mandamus to vacate the court’s order.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.