Campbell v. Indiana

284 N.E.2d 733 (1973)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Campbell (P) sustained personal injuries as a result of a head-on collision with an automobile traveling in P's lane of traffic upon a state-maintained highway. P alleged negligence on the part of the state in that, after repaving the highway, it failed to: (a) mark with a yellow line the aforesaid State Road 221 where it is unsafe to pass; and (b) carelessly and negligently failed to install no passing signs along Road 221 or any other signs indicating to the traveling public that the public highway was unsafe for passing. P also contends that the road as maintained constituted a nuisance. Knotts (P) sued the City of Indianapolis and the State of Indiana complaining that he sustained $100,000 in damages because of personal injuries incurred as the result of a fall on a crosswalk in Indianapolis. Knotts (P) alleged that the injuries were the result of the negligent state of repair of the crosswalk. In both cases, D moved to dismiss alleging that there was no basis upon which relief could be granted premised upon the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The cases were dismissed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. The two cases were consolidated for the purposes of appeal.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.