Carbasho v. Musulin
618 S.E.2d 368 (2005)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P was walking her dog, Groucho, down an alley when both she and the dog were struck by a vehicle driven by Musulin (D). P and Groucho were injured. Groucho died shortly thereafter from its injuries. P sued D seeking damages for her personal injuries and the death of Groucho. The circuit court entered an order stating that 'the only issue remaining to be determined was the property damage value of the dog, Groucho, and whether or not sentimental value, emotional distress and emotional attachment are recoverable damages in West Virginia for the loss of the dog, and if so, to what extent.' D moved for summary judgment to dismiss P's claim for damages in excess of Groucho's assessed value which was estimated to be between $ 100.00 and $ 150.00. The court granted the motion and P appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner