Carvalho v. Decorative Fabrics Co.

366 A.2d 157 (1976)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P worked in a factory handling yarn. At the end of the shift, employees assisted each other with removing lint from each other's clothes by using an air hose. A fellow worker placed the air hose in the vicinity of P's rectum and caused his rectum to be perforated. The worker’s compensation commission denied recovery as this accident occurred from horseplay. P appealed and argues that an employee who is injured as a result of 'horseplay' is entitled to compensation where the injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. D contends that injuries resulting from 'horseplay' are not compensable.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.