Case v. Case

103 P.3d 171 (2004)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

F and M were married in California, in 1992. Two children were born. In March 2002, the parties obtained a divorce judgment) in California. At the time of the divorce, M and the two children had moved to Utah, and F had moved to Maryland. Under the Divorce Judgment, 'child support is ordered as set forth in the attached.' The parties also signed a 'Marital Settlement Agreement' which includes a statement reserving the issue of child support. The MSA also states, 'the parties stipulate that, if the child support awarded is less than the mandatory minimum level, no change of circumstances need be demonstrated to obtain a modification of the child support award to the applicable mandatory minimum level or above.' In March 2003, M filed a 'Verified Petition for Domestication of Decree and Modification of Decree' in Utah. F was served in Maryland, and M then filed a motion for summary judgment. F failed to file a response, and the trial court issued a ruling granting M's motion for summary judgment. F then filed a motion for relief from judgment, which the trial court denied. F appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.