This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Ps are all GMAC-affiliated insurance companies providing comprehensive automobile insurance coverage to insureds within North Carolina, including the repair or replacement of damaged automobile windshields. D is an automobile glass replacement company doing business in North Carolina. Between 1999 and 2004, D replaced broken windshield glass in at least 2,284 P-insured vehicles. Prior to 1999, Ps administered its own glass coverage program and generally paid the full amounts billed by D for work performed for its insureds. In 1999, Ps entered into an agreement with Safelite Solutions - an affiliate of Safelite Auto Glass - to serve as a third-party administrator of its auto glass program. Safelite communicated the prices that Ps would agree to pay D for its services, which generally were lower than what Ps previously had paid. D disputed the Safelite prices. Once an insured filed a claim, Safelite would send D a confirmation fax, including the previously stated price Ps would pay, and a statement that 'performance of services constitutes acceptance of the above price . . . .' D could then perform repair or replacement services and bill Ps the rates it deemed 'fair and reasonable.' D disputed the prices Safelite provided in the confirmation faxes. D accepted the payments from Ps and deposited the money into its corporate accounts, without returning any funds to Ps. D has had similar pricing disputes in Idaho and Washington and brought suit in those states seeking to recover ''unpaid' balances' from insurance carriers in those states. D threatened to file a complaint against Ps. Ps brought this instant action for declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration of the rights of the parties. D counterclaimed for breach of contract as to the alleged unpaid balances. Ps filed a motion for summary judgment. Both the Idaho and Washington appellate courts had issued opinions affirming their respective lower courts' granting of summary judgment against D. D appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.