Citizens For Preservation Of Waterman Lake v. Davis
420 A.2d 53 (1980)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Glocester entered into a contract with Davis (D) to use property as a commercial dump. The Citizens (P) alleged that D's use of the land violated the Fresh Water Westlands Act by dumping trash and fill in a wetlands area without a permit that the dump and its operation was a nuisance and they sought injunctive relief and money damages. Prior to the trial, the town was permitted to intervene as a plaintiff. Glocester then claimed that D breached the terms of its contract with him. The trial judge found for D on all issues. P appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner