Citizens For Preservation Of Waterman Lake v. Davis

420 A.2d 53 (1980)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Glocester entered into a contract with Davis (D) to use property as a commercial dump. The Citizens (P) alleged that D's use of the land violated the Fresh Water Westlands Act by dumping trash and fill in a wetlands area without a permit that the dump and its operation was a nuisance and they sought injunctive relief and money damages. Prior to the trial, the town was permitted to intervene as a plaintiff. Glocester then claimed that D breached the terms of its contract with him. The trial judge found for D on all issues. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.