Citizens For Preservation Of Waterman Lake v. Davis
420 A.2d 53 (1980)
Facts
Glocester entered into a contract with Davis (D) to use property as a commercial dump. The Citizens (P) alleged that D's use of the land violated the Fresh Water Westlands Act by dumping trash and fill in a wetlands area without a permit that the dump and its operation was a nuisance and they sought injunctive relief and money damages. Prior to the trial, the town was permitted to intervene as a plaintiff. Glocester then claimed that D breached the terms of its contract with him. The trial judge found for D on all issues. P appealed.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner