This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

NGC filed a petition requesting a general increase with the Public Service Commission in its rates for natural gas service. The rates would produce an increase of $9,257,633 in revenue. P filed a notice of appearance. D, a new agency created by the legislature, replaced Public. D laid down the procedure by which it would accept the jurisdiction of matters previously filed before the Public Service Commission. D orally approved a general rate increase for $4,400,000 in new revenue. D then filed its written order adopting the oral findings. P argues in part that D violated the section prohibiting ex parte communications during a contested case proceeding, Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-304. This allegation is based on the P's suspicion that members of D's staff had taken part in an investigation of NGC, had prepared a report for D, and had continued to communicate with NGC and relay that information to D's members. P moved to discover what was described as a report from the staff that augmented or boosted the position of one party or the other. D moved to deny the motion. D claimed a right to have privileged communication with a member of his staff for the purpose of understanding issues and analyzing the evidence in the many complicated proceedings that D has to hear. P’s motion was denied.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.